Home Emergency Management News Weather Forecasting Is Better, So Why Not Emergency Management?
Weather Forecasting Is Better, So Why Not Emergency Management?

Weather Forecasting Is Better, So Why Not Emergency Management?


By Allison G. S. Knox
Contributor, EDM Digest

A recent article in the Washington Post explained how Hurricane Laura was forecasted so well with precision and accuracy. In doing so, the forecast gave emergency managers and residents enough time to prepare effectively for the incoming disaster.

Start an Emergency & Disaster Management degree at American Military University.

So if weather forecasts have improved, why aren’t emergency management operations getting better? The answer, unfortunately, lies in the overall structure.

First responder professionals have studied the various facets that go into major disasters like Hurricane Laura. The answer is simply that emergency management is a wicked problem.

According to Stony Brook University, “In 1973, design theorists Horst Rittel and Melvin Webber introduced the term ‘wicked problem’ in order to draw attention to the complexities and challenges of addressing planning and social policy problems. Unlike the ‘tame’ problems of mathematics and chess, the wicked problems of planning lack clarity in both their aims and solutions. In addition to these challenges of articulation and internal logic, they are subject to real-world constraints that prevent multiple and risk-free attempts at solving.”

Emergency Management Operations Improve at an Incremental Rate

Emergency management cannot match the speed of technological advancements. Instead, emergency management operations improve at an incremental rate and are better in some areas of the country than in others.

If we look at emergency management as a whole, we can follow the various cycles of mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery. Further, we can say that FEMA does a tremendous job training emergency management professionals on the various cycles.

Beyond this though, there are many facets to mitigation and preparedness operations. For mitigation, it takes a substantial budget and often many grants (some of which are not made because of financial constraints) to deal effectively with disasters. Further, preparedness operations will always confront people who can't or won't evacuate because of a wide variety of circumstances. Thus, notification of a storm is one thing, but working to get people out of its way is another. Also, working to change building codes and make required renovations on buildings are costly.

It's Not as Simple as a Weather Report to Mitigate Large-Scale Disasters

Thus, it's not as simple as a weather report to mitigate large-scale disasters. Preparedness of operations takes multiple organizations to roll out effective emergency management plans, and even then, not everyone can get out of a storm’s way.

While many of us look to the effectiveness of these plans, they don’t always work well because emergencies evolve in different ways. Plans can seem to be foolproof and solid, but they can easily go sideways if the circumstances aren’t right.

Instead, recovery operations can take a particularly long time. The United States tends to do response rather well, but the recovery process may take years, if not decades to complete. Response is the most complicated phase of emergency management.

The only thing complicating operations more are the various components of society. Large-scale emergencies greatly affect the overall infrastructure, networks of people and the emergency operations of a community. Its fabric can be damaged, and this alone makes emergency management a wicked problem.

Emergency management, ultimately, is a complicated web of numerous issues and policy constraints. A simple weather report does not have lasting effects on emergency response. Where emergencies are concerned, resources need to be gathered, various agencies need to assist, and nonprofit agencies often come into play, while large numbers of volunteers are required to help in the response and recovery efforts.

Emergency management continues to get better, but the sheer amount of resources needed is always a problem.

Allison G. S. Knox Passionate about the issues affecting ambulances and disaster management, Allison focuses on Emergency Management and Emergency Medical Services policy. Allison has taught at the undergraduate level since 2010. Prior to teaching, she worked in a level-one trauma center emergency department and for a member of Congress in Washington, D.C. She holds four master’s degrees in Emergency Management, National Security Studies, International Relations, and History; a Graduate Certificate in Homeland Security; and a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science. Allison is an Emergency Medical Technician, Lifeguard, and Lifeguard Instructor, and is trained in Technical Large Animal Emergency Rescue. She serves on the Board of Trustees for Pi Gamma Mu International Honor Society as Chancellor of the Southeast Region, Vice Chair of the Tactical Emergency Medical Support Committee with the International Public Safety Association, and serves as the Advocacy Coordinator of Virginia with the National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians. She is also a member of several committees including the Editorial Committee with APCO, the Rescue Task Force Committee with the International Public Safety Association, and the Advocacy Committee with the National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians. She also serves as Chair of the Leadership Development Program for the 2020 Pi Gamma Mu Triennial Convention. Allison has published several book reviews and continues to write about issues affecting ambulances, emergency management, and homeland security.